Wednesday, April 30, 2008

24 Frames: The First Film Geek

It wasn’t until the French started going off about movies being “art” and not just entertainment that people began looking at movies with a different eye. It was the magazine Cahiers du Cinema that got the ball rolling. The people who started the magazine were all regular filmgoers of the Cinematheque Francaise, where they learned to love movies. In large part, the Cinematheque was due to one man whom I consider the first film geek on record: Henri Langlois. He was a movie junkie. ‘Watching’ movies would be an understatement. Langlois consumed them. They were his reason for existence.


Langlois’ love of film, and his personal collection, began before the Second World War. When the German occupation kicked in, he smuggled and hid movies that the Nazis were going to destroy. Langlois was cinema’s resistance. Hiding films in basements and bathtubs (which probably explains his hygiene), he would often smuggle them in baby carriages. I know, Langlois was not saving lives, but he was saving culture, and a society without its culture is like a cake without frosting: no taste.

When the war had passed, Langlois would help create the Cinematheque Francaise and become its head programmer. His film lineup would be eclectic and his liner notes would help draw connections in films where the average viewer would find nothing in common. Patrons of the Cinematheque would turn into the filmmakers responsible for the French New Wave. This cinematic movement would throw away the classic rules of cinema and define new ones. It carried such a profound impact that American movies would alter their stride. The French New Wave changed the way we watch movies.

Now, Langlois did more than just show movies. Like any geek, he was obsessed with the minutiae. Langlois collected everything from costumes and production photos to pieces of sets and scripts with notes. Nothing was too small or arbitrary to him. All of the stuff that movie geeks hunt down today on eBay, Langlois was collecting in the 1940s. Now that’s f*king geeky.

Langlois had become a hero of movie lovers and filmmakers around the world, when, in 1968, the French Culture Minister fired him. Much like the revolutionary spirit that had engulfed most of the world at the time, protests and marches were held demanding Langlois be reinstated. Letters were sent from filmmakers like Alfred Hitchcock and Federico Fellini, as well as from all of those cinematic children that Langlois had spawned. It worked, but the Cinematheque’s funding was diminished and Langlois’ health would slowly begin to deteriorate from the long-fought battle.

Now I’m going to digress from the love of movies for a moment and delve into a personal issue that, I feel, really helps define the (mostly true) stereotype of the film geek: Langlois rarely got laid. Yep, he had an incredibly sad sex life. But it’s not like the guy didn’t have his chances. Langlois had met a woman by the name of Mary Meerson. She was the widow of a production designer and was tracked down by Langlois so he could obtain some of her late husband’s works. An incredible friendship was created, because her appetite for movies was just as insatiable as his. They built a relationship so strong you’d think it would’ve evolved into something romantic. Nope. Langlois even lived with her for many years, but he claimed nothing physical ever happened. The rumor was that Meerson desperately loved her pear-shaped film geek counterpart, but nothing ever became of it. He was all about the movies. Now, for most of us geeks it’s not that we’d ignore the opportunity for sex (far from it, trust me), but it does seem that we have developed a lust that, like Langlois’, can only be quenched by cinema.


So if you go to a movie and see that small group of people who are quoting esoteric lines from other movies or debating the career path of the director of the film you’re about to see, you’ve stumbled upon a pod of geeks. They aren’t dangerous or harmful; as a matter of fact they can be quite lovable (yes, I’m describing myself here). Film geeks have a long and honorable lineage that started with Henri Langlois, their under appreciated godhead.

Now here’s a tip: the next time you see some guy pontificating about film, sneak in a line that says, “Well, aren’t you the new Henri Langlois?” If he has no idea who you’re talking about, walk away. As a matter of fact, throw a drink in his face for me and then walk away. If he responds with that “You know who Langlois is?” look of shock, then you’ve found yourself a true film geek. And you probably just made his day.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

The Eclectic Choice: Forty Guns


Forty Guns (1957)
dir. Sam Fuller



Sam Fuller is basically a film Geeks wet dream. The cigar chomping hard nosed story teller is a hero to such directors as Martin Scorsese, Jim Jarmusch and Quentin Tarantino. I could list off a ton of Fuller movies worth watching, but Forty Guns is something special. A western so steeped in sexual innuendo, that you'd have to be a eunuch not to notice it.

Barbara Stanwyck plays Jessica Drummond a rough and tough woman who leads a group of Dragoons. Luckily there are forty of them otherwise they might have had to change the title. Apparently no man can satisfy her until one day Griff Bonnell (Barry Sullivan) and his brothers pass through town. Griff takes the law into his own hands when Jessica's men (one being her brother) get drunk and go nuts, trashing the town. Griff, in one cinemas best showdowns, walks up and cold cocks the brother.

The story moves all over the place as Griff and Jessica begin a "relationship". Now this is a guys movie. Sure, the woman toguh and wild, but she only needs the right man to tame her. Sexist, a little. Sexually charged and heated, definitely.

But honestly can you go wrong with dialog like this?

Jessica Drummond: I'm not interested in "you", Mr. Bonnell. It's your trademark. [gestures at his gun, purring] May I feel it?
Griff Bonnell: Uh-uh.
Jessica Drummond: Just curious.
Griff Bonnell: It might go off in your face.
Jessica Drummond: I'll take a chance.

I don't remember if she's wearing a pearl necklace in the scene, but it wouldn't surprise me.

With great performances, clockwork pacing and some stunning visual work, it's well worth the time. Watch it with someone you love. Or someone you want to score.

Move it to the top of your queue or buy it here.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

24 Frames: Who's Watching Who?

I’m the art snob of the bunch, I’m more than happy to admit it. I do believe that movies are allowed, actually duty bound, to be more than entertaining at times. Don’t get me wrong I love plain old entertainment. I love movies like Sin City, Die Hard, Big Trouble In Little China as much as I enjoy taking a 4am run to In-N-Out burger. But I also love Elephant, Breathless, The Station Agent just as much if not more.




Why?

There is a British filmmaker named Peter Greenaway. He has made some incredible films and some pieces of junk. His most infamous work is The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover. It’s visually stunning, grotesque, decadent, horrific and funny. The first time I saw it I was so uncomfortable after the first scene, I wondered if I would make it through the entire movie. So why did I stay? Because the film was asking me to do more than just sit back and watch. It was asking me to be a participant on an emotional level. It tested who I was as a person and made me question what it is that I believe is right and wrong. Where was my moral line and how far was I willing to cross it? He was challenging me to look at the world from a different perspective.

I bring up Greenaway because he said something once that really struck me and has always been a go-to line when discussing my stance on film. He said, “There was a time when people watched movies, now movies watch people.” I’ll be the snob here and say: take a minute. Read that out loud. Let it roll around in the skull and marinade.

All right, what does it mean? It means that there was a time when movies were self-contained beings, not homogenized, gentrified, tested, and target-audienced to within an inch of its life. Movies could address topics that might be difficult to bring up. They could have characters that may not be the most likable or acceptable. They could play with plot, theme, structure, editing, and visual style. These are the elements that make up what is called the ‘language of film’. Now most popular movies require no thought process. They have turned us into sheep. Don’t get angry, I can prove it.

National Treasure. Pick one, it doesn’t matter. Justin Bartha plays Riley, the tech nerd/wacky sidekick to Nicholas Cage. I saw these movies in the theater on a day when the audience was around half capacity. Now at several moments during both of these movies, the sidekick responds with a one-liner to a situation. One of these lines was, “Who wants to go down the creepy tunnel inside the tomb first?” A majority of the audience cracked up. Is this line funny? Does it have any creativity to it? No, no it doesn’t. Oh, and was it in the trailer that was playing on television twenty-four seven? Yes, yes it was. The audience laughs because we have been trained over the years to laugh at any little shtick the sidekick spouts. Think about it. Think about all of the sidekicks over the years that have been played by talented comics or character actors who were given creative dialog. Take the line from Aliens when Hudson (Bill Paxton) whales, “That's it man, game over man, game over!” How ever ridiculous it seems now, the first time hearing it we laughed because it was spontaneous and brought out a moment that actually helped build the character a little bit. A very little bit, but a little bit nonetheless.

Today you’ll also find that most commercial films are about branding. Any title or name recognition will do the trick. Let’s face it, we all saw the trilogy based off of the Disneyland ride. (Yes, I enjoyed The Country Bears as much as you did.) Much like the characters we have been trained to respond to, we’ve been trained to respond to branding, good or bad. The film industry, I mean studio executives here, could end up spending a couple hundred million on a movie and they want to make sure it’s something that everyone already knows about. They want to see big returns for their big investment. They want to target kids and the parents’ nostalgia gland. So whip out a Transformers or a G.I. Joe. You’re guaranteed a big opening weekend. You’re guaranteed we’ll all "ooooh and ahhh" as the car turns into a giant robot because it reminds us of how cool it was to play with those toys when we were younger. We’ll cheer when Megatron gets smashed or a building crumbles under the weight of two tons of sentient metal crashing into it.

Now I can name a ton of films out there that are smarter, that don’t tow the corporate line. Some of them find an audience (look at Juno) but most slip through the cracks. I’m not saying they are better films, some of them suck, like really suck. But these films attempt to reach us from a different perspective. They ask us to challenge ourselves, to connect and try to understand what is going on instead of ringing a bell so we start to salivate.

We can’t stop the machine; I’m not inciting revolution. That would be naive. Just do one thing for the hell of it. We’ll call it a social experiment to make us sound smart. The next time your out at a big ol’ blockbuster popcorn movie, take three to five minutes during a dialog scene where there is some comic relief. Separate yourself from the movie and just feel what’s going on in the audience. When they laugh at something, was it earned, or was it a trained response? Was the movie watching you at that moment, or am I just talking out of my ass? It wouldn’t be the first time.


Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Film Geek Primer: Episode #2

FILM GEEK PRIMER:
EPISODE #2

WHAT'S A GEEK?








So, what makes a film geek a film geek?

We try to answer that age old question by looking at some of the personality traits of film geeks.

Some of the more famous film geeks in history are also introduced. Paulene Kael, Quentin Tarantino, Harry Knowles and Henri Langois.

Monday, April 21, 2008

The Eclectic Choice: Snuff


SNUFF (1976)
dir. Michael & Roberta Finlay


I thought I’d recommend a DVD you don’t need to worry about buying this week while still imparting some cinematic knowledge.

This is the movie where that whole, “a real human is killed on screen” thing started. It’s all bollocks of course. The film itself is pretty tedious and boring. I ended up scanning through most of it as it tells the story of a sort of Manson-esque family. Blah, blah, blah, boring, boring, boring. (And yes, I know I’m a deviant for watching it.)

At the end of the movie, you hear the director yell, "Cut!" The film then supposedly becomes “real”, as we watch them kill a woman. This ending was added on later to try and help boost the reputation of an already crappy movie. It did solidify the term “snuff” to be forever linked with killing a person, so it does have a certain historical semblance to it.

An interesting factoid, it was directed by a husband and wife team Michael and Roberta Findlay. Ain't love grand!

Do real snuff movies exist? Yes, but this isn’t the one. So the next time some bearded film geek spouts about Snuff being the real deal, you can smack those Fritos crumbs off his pudgy smug face.

Rent it as a sociological study, or buy it from Blue Underground video. They sell lots of great stuff as well, but as far as Snuff goes, caveat emptor.

The Eclectic Choice: Blast of Silence

BLAST OF SILENCE (1961)
dir. Allen Baron

Admittedly, when you say Criterion DVD release, you think foreign films and that's a good thing. Criterion has been working their buns off since the days of laser disc to bring some of the greatest films around into our living rooms.




Always with plenty of extras and always looking for the best prints available.

This week they bring us a very little known film called Blast of Silence (1961). Now, I'll be honest and say this movie has only lived in myth for me. I've missed every screening that has come around and I've refused to watch some crappy bootlegged copy. So this is good news for me!

The basic plot involves a hit man on a job in NYC during Christmas. It features what Criterion calls, "At once visually ragged and artfully composed, and featuring rough, poetic narration performed by Lionel Stander, Blast of Silence is a stylish triumph." Linoel Stander is one of those character actors with a gravelly voice that just screams personality. Do you really need more than that?

You can order it through Amazon, but the best deal seems to be through DVD Planet.

I dare you not to check it out!

Film Geek Primer: Episode #1

FILM GEEK PRIMER:
EPISODE #1

INTRO











This first episode introduces you to the hosts of the show and provides brief information on a couple of the genres loved by experienced geeks.



Topics:

LUCHA LIBRE MOVIES
These action, adventure, science fiction, and horror films featured masked Mexican wrestlers and were extremely popular. Lucha legends such as El Santo and Mil Mascaras fought corruption, defended sexy chicas, and battled vampires, zombies and other fantastic creatures. Although badly acted and often ineptly shot, these mainstay staples of B-cinema are still a lot of fun.

SPAGHETTI WESTERNS
This sub-genre of the western was created Italy and made famous such directors as Sergio Leone and Sergio Corbucci. Spaghetti westerns were low-budget, shot in Italian, featured stark cinematography, were extremely violent, and vastly contrasted mainstream Hollywood's idealist visions of the American West. These films launched the careers of actors Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef and Franco Nero.

LORENZO LAMAS
The former Falcon Crest and Renegade actor has prospered making direct to video movies that have a very loyal cult following. Lamas' good looks, stilted acting, and ham-jawed delivery maintain his status as the idol of bad movie nights around the globe.